Bibliometric analysis of academic journal recommendations and requirements for surgical and anesthesiologic adverse events reporting

Tamir N. Sholklapper, Jorge Ballon, Aref S. Sayegh, Anibal La Riva, Laura C. Perez, Sherry Huang, Michael Eppler, Gregg Nelson, Giovanni Marchegiani, Robert Hinchliffe, Luca Gordini, Marc Furrer, Michael J. Brenner, Salome Dell-Kuster, Chandra Shekhar Biyani, Nader Francis, Haytham M.A. Kaafarani, Matthias Siepe, Des Winter, Julie A. SosaFrancesco Bandello, Robert Siemens, Jochen Walz, Alberto Briganti, Christian Gratzke, Andre L. Abreu, Mihir M. Desai, Rene Sotelo, Riaz Agha, Keith D. Lillemoe, Steven Wexner, Gary S. Collins, Inderbir Gill, Giovanni E. Cacciamani

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

BACKGROUND: Standards for reporting surgical adverse events (AEs) vary widely within the scientific literature. Failure to adequately capture AEs hinders efforts to measure the safety of healthcare delivery and improve the quality of care. The aim of the present study is to assess the prevalence and typology of perioperative AE reporting guidelines among surgery and anesthesiology journals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In November 2021, three independent reviewers queried journal lists from the SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) portal (www.scimagojr.com), a bibliometric indicator database for surgery and anesthesiology academic journals. Journal characteristics were summarized using SCImago, a bibliometric indicator database extracted from Scopus journal data. Quartile 1 (Q1) was considered the top quartile and Q4 bottom quartile based on the journal impact factor. Journal author guidelines were collected to determine whether AE reporting recommendations were included and, if so, the preferred reporting procedures. RESULTS: Of 1409 journals queried, 655 (46.5%) recommended surgical AE reporting. Journals most likely to recommend AE reporting were: by category surgery (59.1%), urology (53.3%), and anesthesia (52.3%); in top SJR quartiles (i.e. more influential); by region, based in Western Europe (49.8%), North America (49.3%), and the Middle East (48.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery and anesthesiology journals do not consistently require or provide recommendations on perioperative AE reporting. Journal guidelines regarding AE reporting should be standardized and are needed to improve the quality of surgical AE reporting with the ultimate goal of improving patient morbidity and mortality.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)1489-1496
Número de páginas8
PublicaciónInternational Journal of Surgery
Volumen109
N.º5
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 may. 2023
Publicado de forma externa

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Bibliometric analysis of academic journal recommendations and requirements for surgical and anesthesiologic adverse events reporting'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto